© 2000 John Petroff 

2)- Review of different project types

a)- Replacement of equipment

The calculation is conducted on incremental after tax cash flows resulting from the project, including the initial cash outlay, discounted at an appropriate discount rate (as spelled out in Chapter 2). Additional comments on cash flows are presented in the next section. In this case of equipment replacement, there may be no incremental cash inflow, i.e. no additional revenue, but there is a reduction in cash expenses (e.g. less maintenance and repair expense, operating cost, energy consumption, etc.). The discount rate that should be used in this case is the average cost of capital which should be adjusted for a lower risk premium than that of the overall firm. The lower risk premium is justified by the decrease in likelihood that the equipment will fail, and, therefore, that sales would be lost as they may have been with the old equipment. If the new equipment does not reduce the chance of missed sales but merely maintains sales pattern as it is, the discount rate must be exactly the same as that of the overall company. If, on the contrary, sales could be disrupted by equipment failure the discount rate must be higher.

b)- Expansion of existing sales

This type of project involves, for instance, major promotional campaigns or expansion of an existing plant. As explained in Chapter 2, each annual incremental after-tax cash flow is calculated by
- adding new revenues generated by sales solely related to the project,
- deducting additional costs (including depreciation) that are associated with these sales,
- deducting applicable tax (calculated at the marginal rate), and
- adding back depreciation.

The cash outlay should include payment for the new facility, equipment or promotional campaign, and also for the additional working capital (accounts receivable and inventory) that will be necessary to attain the planned sales volume. In this case, the discount rate to be used is the average company cost of capital itself because the expansion of sales (as long as such expansion is moderate) does not add to the risk of the firm. The weighted average cost of capital is further discussed in the next chapter.

a)- New products:

The introduction of new products is the most risky of all projects for the firm because the firm will have to deal with unfamiliar customers and competitors. The cash flows are calculated as in the case of sales expansion, with the same attention given to the increased working capital. A major difficulty in estimation relates to realistic sales projections. Market research is an added outlay that is often necessary to support forecasts.

Another difficulty resides in the selection of an appropriate discount rate. One method for choosing such a rate is to find out what banks will charge for the incremental capital the firm will need for the project, or the yield that must be offered if a bond has to be floated. This marginal cost of capital is far from perfect because it assumes a different capital structure. Another approach is to use a risk premium obtained from stock market pricing of risk (i.e. BETA calculation), for firms engaged in this particular product line or a product as similar as possible.

 As an example of capital budgeting in real life, we take the in-process research and development reported in " Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Conditions" in Lucent Technologies 1999 Annual Report, pages 36-37. There, Lucent discusses the acquisition of four companies for their in-process research and development in the following terms:

"Lucent estimated the fair value of in-process research and development for each of the above acquisitions using an income approach. This involved estimating the fair value of the in-process research and development using the present value of the estimated after-tax cash flows expected to be generated by the purchased in-process research and development, using risk-adjusted discount rates and revenue forecasts as appropriate. The selection of the discount rate was based on consideration of Lucent's weighted average cost of capital, as well as other factors, including the useful life of each technology, profitability levels of each technology, the uncertainty of technology advances that were known at the time, and the stage of completion of each technology. Lucent believes that the estimated in-process research and development amounts so determined represent fair value and do not exceed the amount a third party would pay for the projects."

Table T-10.3 lists the major characteristics of the four affiliates described in detail in Lucent's Annual Report.

Table T-10.3

Lucent Technologies in-process research and development
Affiliate product life discount rate
Octel voice/data messaging 1998-2006 20%
Livingston internet connection 1998-2007 20%
Yurie ATM access solutions 1999-2009 20%
Stratus fault-tolerant computers 1999-2009 35%

Notice the discount rate assigned to the different companies: specifically the 35% assigned to Stratus, presumably because of the uncertainty of this technology.

See review questions Q-10E2.1 through Q-10E2.15.

See research assignment R-10E2.1.

 Previous: 1-Calculation

Last modified: Jun/01/01
Next: 3-Lives_different: